NAIROBI/ADDIS
ABABA(August 4,2008) - Tensions between Ethiopia and
Eritrea are unlikely to escalate immediately following the departure
of UN peacekeepers, but a mechanism should be found to quickly engage
the two neighbours, an analyst said.
The Security Council terminated the UN Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea
(UNMEE) on 31 July.
"The decision is basically a formalisation of the reality because
UNMEE has really not been on the ground," Fouad Hikmat, Horn
of Africa director for the International Crisis Group (ICG), told
IRIN.
Ethiopia and Eritrea have both said a return to conflict is unlikely,
but other analysts fear an accidental trigger or clash could ignite
the situation, leading to a flare-up in the absence of a buffer.
"Both countries do not want to go to war, but the situation is
very sensitive and the troops are close to each other," Hikmat
added. "Hopefully the two will now try to engage."
UNMEE has begun removing its equipment and assets, including 320 military
personnel, in Ethiopia. "The mission was sent at the request
of both countries to keep the peace after a two-year war claimed at
least 70,000 Ethiopian and Eritrean lives," UNMEE's acting head
Azouz Ennifar, said.
"It was a difficult mission in geographically harsh locations,
but the men and women who served ... did not flinch."
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon regretted the decision, saying both
parties had rejected options for a possible follow-on presence that
had been suggested at the request of the Council.
"[The Secretary-General] expresses hope that the parties would
be able to break the current stalemate and create conditions necessary
for the normalisation of their relations, which is key to peace
and stability in the region," he said.
Hikmat called for the appointment of an international envoy to kick-start
an engagement between the two. "There is no clear mechanism
for engagement at the moment," he told IRIN on 1 August. "A
special envoy could energise the process of engagement."
Responding to the Council decision, Ethiopia said dialogue was the
best way to resolve the stalemate, but added that Eritrea had frustrated
UNMEE and retained a "provocative" stance. "Ethiopia
has a firm stand that the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea
ought to be solved through peaceful means," an information
ministry statement said.
Eritrea said UNMEE's termination was "overdue". "UNMEE's
presence was really symbolic, it was not a peace enforcement force,
it does not have the capability of deterrent - so it's not going
to have any impact," spokesman Yemane Gebremeskel told the
BBC.
"Legally Ethiopia's occupation of Eritrea is untenable - it
cannot be accepted by the international community - I think our
focus has been on the legal end and the diplomatic dimensions of
the issue," he added.
Border tensions
The two countries fought a bloody war from 1998-2000 over their
1,000km border. A peace accord signed in Algiers in 2000 set up
an independent commission to defuse tensions by defining the border.
The commission issued a ruling in 2002 placing Badme, a symbolic
border town over which the war had broken out, in Eritrea. Physical
demarcation of the commission-defined border on the ground never
took place.
Amid rising tensions, a 4,200-strong UN force was deployed to monitor
the cessation of hostilities and to help ensure the observance of
security commitments by both parties.
But relations between Eritrea and UNMEE deteriorated, forcing an
end to military operations. UNMEE helicopter flights were stopped
and fuel supplies cut. Without enough fuel, the force found itself
unable to transport personnel, generate electricity and refrigerate
food or medical supplies. War risks
In June, the ICG warned that the border impasse carried serious
risks of a new war and was a major source of instability in the
Horn of Africa, most critically for Somalia.
"Both regimes have used it as an excuse to enhance their domestic
power at the expense of democracy and economic growth, thus reducing
the attractiveness to them of diplomatic compromise," it warned
in a report, Beyond the Fragile Peace between Ethiopia and Eritrea:
Averting New War.
"They support the other's domestic rebels, and each is convinced
that the fall of the other's regime is imminent and the only real
solution to the border dispute."
ICG called for a virtual demarcation of the border, transformation
of UNMEE into a more mobile, faster-reacting tripwire mechanism
and the appointment by the UN of a special negotiator to manage
an alternative forum for dialogue.
"The immediate priority is to persuade Ethiopia to withdraw
its troops from all land the [border commission] awarded Eritrea
and for Eritrea to pull its army back from the TSZ [Transitional
Security Zone]," the ICG warned.
|